Audit
has become an essential part of medical practice. The main purpose is to
improve quality of care. In the Critical Care Unit, this should involve all
members of the multidisciplinary team. Change in practice in one discipline will
inevitably have a knock-on effect in others. Audit may involve a
review of activity, performance against pre-determined indicators or cost-effectiveness.
Audit may focus on specifi c topics or may encompass the
performance of several Critical Care Units. A successful audit requires commitment
from senior staff to ensure practice is defined, data are collected,
and change is effected where necessary. Where change is suggested by
audit, a further review is required to ensure that such change has occurred.
Data
collection
Ideally, a basic dataset should be
common to all Critical Care Units nationally to allow meaningful
comparisons to be made. This requires a dataset detailed enough to answer
questions posed, but not so detailed that collection becomes unsustainable.
Resources must be provided in terms of computer databases and staff to
collect and analyse data. This is a skilled task that should not be
delegated to junior team members. The data collector should be familiar
with the fundamentals of critical care medicine, and be provided with
regular summary reviews to ensure enthusiasm continues and quality control
is maintained. Methods of data entry should consider the time involved
and that most of those collecting data are not keyboard experts. Typographical
mistakes destroy the value of collected data so error trapping and
data validation must form part of the housekeeping in any database used.
Some audit topics require data collection outside the basic dataset.
Collecting appropriate data requires clarity in setting the question to be
answered and care in choosing data items that will truly answer the question.
Audit
meetings
Regular audit meetings should follow a
pre-defi ned timetable. This helps to ensure maximum staff attendance and
also sets target dates for data collection and analysis. Audit meetings
should be chaired and have defi ned aims. Discussion of the topic being
audited must lead to recommended changes in practice and these must be
followed through after the meeting. It is clear that all staff cannot attend
all meetings. Dissemination of information prior to implementing proposed changes
is necessary to stand some chance of carrying them through.
0 comments:
Post a Comment